|
Post by Edna Krabappel on Oct 23, 2009 20:29:59 GMT -5
who is she? They used to be Simona Halep.
|
|
|
Post by Edna Krabappel on Oct 23, 2009 20:31:38 GMT -5
Now seriously, that's a Romanian player Simona Halep. She's since had a breast reduction.
|
|
|
Post by DBBN on Oct 23, 2009 21:14:28 GMT -5
Now she's just Simon Hale.
|
|
|
Post by Traveling Man on Oct 24, 2009 12:11:01 GMT -5
As long as she's a 34C or above, post-reduction, I'm not complaining.
|
|
|
Post by Iorix on Oct 25, 2009 16:22:15 GMT -5
As long as she's a 34C or above, post-reduction, I'm not complaining. Post-reduction:
|
|
|
Post by leelee on Oct 25, 2009 17:19:04 GMT -5
Simona looks better, and I'm sure her back is thankful. Cute face too.
|
|
Viktymize
Full Member
I <3 Nicola.
Posts: 127
|
Post by Viktymize on Oct 25, 2009 17:38:15 GMT -5
As long as she's a 34C or above, post-reduction, I'm not complaining. Post-reduction: I'd say a real nice figure even without what's on top. Cute face, but shame about that nose.
|
|
|
Post by Traveling Man on Oct 28, 2009 9:26:59 GMT -5
Too bad. They don't look like a handful which is a damned shame.
|
|
|
Post by Iorix on Nov 21, 2009 17:16:29 GMT -5
Sacrilege, I know, but I think she has prettier eyes than Bepa.
|
|
|
Post by The Chloe on Nov 21, 2009 22:42:20 GMT -5
Who is that?
|
|
|
Post by leelee on Nov 21, 2009 23:53:41 GMT -5
Errani is the only player I know of with eyes like that... if it's her, $100m to that makeup artist.
|
|
|
Post by Iorix on Nov 22, 2009 6:57:43 GMT -5
Errani, yes. Makeup courtesy of Italian TV.
Portuguese TV makeup artists specialise in making stumpy politicians look orange.
|
|
|
Post by lexpretend on Nov 22, 2009 8:52:44 GMT -5
Wow, Errani lookin' good there.
Lina K's eyes are probably still the WTA benchmark.
|
|
|
Post by Bruguera's heavy balls on Jan 4, 2010 16:59:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Iorix on Jan 4, 2010 17:40:40 GMT -5
Yes she is, and since I've already told you her age at the other thread, maybe a thread with sexxxxing on the title isn't the appropriate place for this discussion.
|
|
|
Post by Maeby Fünke on Jan 4, 2010 19:42:13 GMT -5
I thought it was only Americans who made a fuss about that. If she has bosoms I don't see the problem.
|
|
|
Post by Iorix on Jan 5, 2010 5:44:19 GMT -5
[Toad mode]I was yoking.[/Toad mode].
And forgot to put a smilie in the end.
Like lurker said, she does look cute, in a "golden brown" way that is unusual for an Anglo.
|
|
|
Post by The Chloe on Jan 5, 2010 7:16:52 GMT -5
Also, she proves the theory that anybody looks better when standing next to Murray. Jesus.
|
|
|
Post by leelee on Jan 5, 2010 17:09:43 GMT -5
Yeah, that's like standing next to a fat person. You always look better.
But, Robson is cute... can't deny that. Like a tall, Anglo version of Maria Jose.
I doubt she'll amount to much at the next level. She's got the perfect power game to dominate juniors... good serve, big FH, but she's very slothy. Move her side to side at all, and she's done.
|
|
|
Post by DBBN on Jan 5, 2010 18:25:55 GMT -5
I thought it was only Americans who made a fuss about that. If she has bosoms I don't see the problem. I don't have any problems with 15, 17, even 18-year-olds talking about wanting to bone a 15-year-old girl. Y'all, on the other hand... And don't interpret that as me saying I'm going to do anything about it...to each his or her own. I'm just saying I certainly can see why people would feel uncomfortable or even angry about that particular conversational pathway.
|
|
|
Post by janie on Jan 5, 2010 18:33:37 GMT -5
I thought it was only Americans who made a fuss about that. If she has bosoms I don't see the problem. Some 11 year old girls have bosoms. Even some 10 year olds. So that might not be the best guideline.
|
|
|
Post by Edna Krabappel on Jan 5, 2010 20:54:46 GMT -5
I thought it was only Americans who made a fuss about that. If she has bosoms I don't see the problem. I don't have any problems with 15, 17, even 18-year-olds talking about wanting to bone a 15-year-old girl. Y'all, on the other hand... And don't interpret that as me saying I'm going to do anything about it...to each his or her own. I'm just saying I certainly can see why people would feel uncomfortable or even angry about that particular conversational pathway. Agreed. There are some 15-year olds who look much older than their age, and while I'm not saying it's OK to bone them, it's somewhat more understandable why people would discuss them in that way. And Robson, albeit cute, does look 15.
|
|
|
Post by The Chloe on Jan 8, 2010 8:45:38 GMT -5
To be fair, nobody here has said they wanted to bone Robson. Yet.
Also, I can think of a few 17/18 year olds who I'd do. I am not ashamed of this. It's okay if they're wealthy and fit, right? Right.
|
|
|
Post by DBBN on Jan 8, 2010 13:39:02 GMT -5
Okay, see, here's the thing: 15-year-old BOYS can be perved over, because all 15-year-old boys are wanting, hoping, praying to do is have sex. Fatbecca can perv over any young stud she wants to because they want her to get with them. The exception is when gay guys perv over young straight boys. But it is okay for gay men perv over young gay boys, for the same reasons as stated above.
This makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by leelee on Jan 8, 2010 14:58:04 GMT -5
15-year-olds, fine, I guess. But, today, 11-year-olds want to hump everything. And while it may still not be publicly acceptable, most young girls want it too. It's a slippery slope.
I don't care because the human body intended for us to have sex and make babies at a much younger age than today's society suggests. If a 13-year-old and a 26-year-old both really want to do it, then I don't have a problem with it, as long as the 26 realizes the potential consequences. Thankfully, I'm not attracted to teens anymore.
|
|
|
Post by Maeby Fünke on Jan 8, 2010 14:58:52 GMT -5
It really doesn't. It makes all sorts of old-fashioned and possibly reactionary assumptions which aren't even relevant to whether someone is sexually attractive or not. If I say I think a 15 year old is attractive, which on this occasion I am not, I'm not saying I am intending to lure them to my bed with any combination of charm, good looks or drugs. I'm just saying they're hot.
Thats why I think physical and sexual maturity are more important than an arbitrary age.
|
|
|
Post by Maeby Fünke on Jan 8, 2010 15:00:03 GMT -5
I don't need to quote Hurleys post, nobody is going to get in before me.
|
|
|
Post by Maeby Fünke on Jan 8, 2010 15:01:26 GMT -5
15-year-olds, fine, I guess. But, today, 11-year-olds want to hump everything. And while it may still not be publicly acceptable, most young girls want it too. It's a slippery slope. I don't care because the human body intended for us to have sex and make babies at a much younger age than today's society suggests. If a 13-year-old and a 26-year-old both really want to do it, then I don't have a problem with it, as long as the 26 realizes the potential consequences. Thankfully, I'm not attracted to teens anymore. I'd be more worried about the 13 year old realizing the potential consequences.
|
|
|
Post by lexpretend on Jan 8, 2010 15:22:36 GMT -5
Well, teenagers all want it, but the thing is that they don't really know what they're wanting. Basically, what 13-year-old realises the potential consequences.
|
|
|
Post by DBBN on Jan 8, 2010 17:30:16 GMT -5
It really doesn't. It makes all sorts of old-fashioned and possibly reactionary assumptions which aren't even relevant to whether someone is sexually attractive or not. You are correct that the gender bias as mentioned in my post is fairly antiquated (i.e. "you shouldn't want to bone young girls because young girls are only interested in LOVE"), but...that doesn't make it wrong. As for the rest, my post seems pretty sound.
|
|