|
|
Post by Lady on Jan 22, 2014 6:18:57 GMT -5
How come those commentators don't understand the rules? You replay the point after the overrule, doesn't matter if the overrule comes on the 2nd serve or after 30-shots rally. And Mats Wilander, you actually played this sport!
This game last 12 minutes now, it started with 0-40
|
|
|
|
Post by lexpretend on Jan 22, 2014 6:22:23 GMT -5
A million deuces
|
|
|
|
Post by lexpretend on Jan 22, 2014 6:22:51 GMT -5
Haha did Murray break the net?!
|
|
|
|
Post by Lady on Jan 22, 2014 6:25:20 GMT -5
Haha did Murray break the net?! Yep! LOL Another deuce, this game lasts forever |
|
|
|
Post by Lady on Jan 22, 2014 6:26:51 GMT -5
Murray holds after winning the point Fed should have won
|
|
|
|
Post by lexpretend on Jan 22, 2014 6:27:05 GMT -5
Massively stupid approach right back to Murray from Fed and Murray finally takes the game after TEN deuces and saving 7 BPs
|
|
|
|
Post by Traveling Man on Jan 22, 2014 6:35:22 GMT -5
So ecstatic to be rid of the most horrid player in the women's draw. Now that Azza is out, Aga has served her purpose and must lose. Li for the Slam title plz.
Also Murray isn't going away which is brilliant. I thought it would be over by now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Traveling Man on Jan 22, 2014 6:44:26 GMT -5
Also, WHY THE FUCK is "Bouchard meets furry friends" all over AO website and app? :mad:
|
|
|
|
Post by janie on Jan 22, 2014 6:53:15 GMT -5
Tennis on again this morning!!
|
|
|
|
Post by lexpretend on Jan 22, 2014 6:54:10 GMT -5
Awesome point. Let's see whether Federer can serve it out this time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lady on Jan 22, 2014 6:55:18 GMT -5
Fed is serving for the match again 5-3
amazing 1st point 0-15
|
|
|
|
Post by Lady on Jan 22, 2014 6:58:13 GMT -5
He did! And did it from 0-30! Fed was so pumped, screaming stuff etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by lexpretend on Jan 22, 2014 6:58:20 GMT -5
Clutch serving finally sees Fed over the line.
|
|
|
|
Post by janie on Jan 22, 2014 6:58:23 GMT -5
OH!!!! WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW!!!! love love love that I got to see the tail end of this match!
|
|
|
|
Post by lexpretend on Jan 22, 2014 6:59:29 GMT -5
Obviously the "Federere is BACK!!!!1111" narrative is a lot more dependent on how he does vs. Nadal than vs. a just-off-back-surgery Murray.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lady on Jan 22, 2014 7:01:00 GMT -5
OMG, Federer is making fun of his poor break-point conversion record!! LOLOLOL
|
|
|
|
Post by janie on Jan 22, 2014 7:01:54 GMT -5
Sure, but so what? Just for him to beat one of those top dogs is huge, these days. Edberg & Fed, great team!!! <3
|
|
|
|
Post by Denise49IQ on Jan 22, 2014 7:03:33 GMT -5
The fuck that injury. And that game to get broken? Ugh.
|
|
|
|
Post by janie on Jan 22, 2014 7:05:51 GMT -5
Also, WHY THE FUCK is "Bouchard meets furry friends" all over AO website and app? :mad: Haha! They always do that. At least EB is still in the tournament! They did this with Porni after she had already lost in r2. |
|
|
|
Post by janie on Jan 22, 2014 7:06:35 GMT -5
I am so happy that you guys got to watch this match. It must have been fabulous.  |
|
|
|
Post by janie on Jan 22, 2014 7:13:39 GMT -5
So Chloe is the only one who saw part of the Nadal match?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Chloe on Jan 22, 2014 7:49:09 GMT -5
Burley saw it, too, but as we know, he's left us for a much, much worse place.
|
|
|
|
Post by janie on Jan 22, 2014 7:59:48 GMT -5
Yeah, heck with him.  The part of the match you saw, was it high quality? Was Dimitrov doing anything special? |
|
|
|
Post by Old Hag on Jan 22, 2014 14:42:15 GMT -5
Burley saw it, too, but as we know, he's left us for a much, much worse place. Where did he go |
|
|
|
Post by The Chloe on Jan 22, 2014 18:21:39 GMT -5
Twitter.
Neither Dimitrov nor Nadal were that great when I watched. I only saw the second set, though. Nadal's worst was worse than GD's in that set, and neither was amazingly impressive for more than a string of points. Maybe the first set was better.
|
|
|
|
Post by janie on Jan 22, 2014 19:56:11 GMT -5
Neither Dimitrov nor Nadal were that great when I watched. I only saw the second set, though. Nadal's worst was worse than GD's in that set, and neither was amazingly impressive for more than a string of points. Maybe the first set was better. Good. I'll just extrapolate from this and assume the rest of the match was forgettable, too.  Unfortunately I'm thinking the AO may be over for me now! I'll sleep through the rest of it. I guess this happens every year but it dismays me anew each year.  |
|
|
|
Post by Old Hag on Jan 22, 2014 22:04:17 GMT -5
Over for me too, I really hate it  10pm EST finals back in the day were the best |
|
|
|
Post by R. Black on Jan 22, 2014 23:09:39 GMT -5
I don't care that she's Canadian, Bouchard = zzz.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Chloe on Jan 22, 2014 23:17:42 GMT -5
Yeah, whatever to Bouchard. Why can't we have somebody with charisma? MORE SIMON LAROSE
|
|
|
|
Post by Old Hag on Jan 22, 2014 23:19:02 GMT -5
I'm afraid Bouchard will have a legit climb up the rankings, unlike Sloane. Good serve, great speed and retrieving, powerful enough off the ground, and all the coddled confidence in the world. She's got the tools for today's game. Probably not many slams, if any. But, top 10 for years, I'd bet she does.
|
|
The part of the match you saw, was it high quality? Was Dimitrov doing anything special?
