|
Post by shenaynay on Feb 7, 2006 20:54:57 GMT -5
Elena Bovina is not winning matches, therefore, I do not feel good about myself.
And I really don't. I have a toothache, so I am massive pissage.
|
|
|
Post by DBBN on Feb 7, 2006 21:19:43 GMT -5
You are right to associate goings-on in the professional tennis and tennis message board communities with your own feelings of self-worth. Continue!
|
|
|
Post by shenaynay on Feb 7, 2006 21:45:15 GMT -5
Serena Williams is ranked #37, therefore, that makes me feel glad that I'm white.
Christine Henin has no breasts, therefore, I feel voluptuous.
|
|
|
Post by shenaynay on Feb 7, 2006 21:49:03 GMT -5
Karol Beck constantly gives me images of Scotso sticking his penis into a poster of him, therefore, I get freaked.
|
|
|
Post by DBBN on Feb 7, 2006 22:11:10 GMT -5
Your description of that causes me to become both nauseated and shamefully aroused.
Man. Can we get back to bashing Kim? *Kim bash* *Kim bash*
|
|
|
Post by shenaynay on Feb 7, 2006 23:33:03 GMT -5
Vera Zvonareva has mental breakdown #1324234234234, therefore, I know I can never be the craziest bitch alive, no matter what I do.
Kim Clijsters makes me feel good all the time. As she is the opposite of me. She's always fake nice, I'm always real cunty. She's really ugly, I'm really hot. She fakes injuries a lot, I can't even fake injuries because I'm so unlucky.
|
|
|
Post by Grarliner on Feb 8, 2006 19:10:02 GMT -5
Yes, I read what people said about Justine. No, I don't think I'm taking this too seriously. I think Jean Smart's Tennis Newswire might be. Since I haven't mentioned anything serious about what you're ranting incoherently about, I think this is yet another of your instances of lack of comprehension. How can I take this argument seriously when I have never discussed it seriously? Right. ;D The only thing I'm taking seriously is your insistence that no one is answering your question because no one has a point. You should be thrilled about that; that's the only way a tard like you would ever win an argument. No, of course you're not taking this seriously. If you were, I might expect rants like the above.
|
|
|
Post by DBBN on Feb 8, 2006 19:21:04 GMT -5
You and Chole were talking about the Justine/Kim comparison, which you have even admitted I had "nothing." So, since I never discussed it, I cannot take it seriously. You are wrong, you are an idiot. 1. I told you what I did take seriously. It's right there in the post you quoted. You are wrong, you are an idiot. 2. Man, it used to be hard to make you look stupid. Well...not hard. But less easy.
|
|
|
Post by Brinyi on Feb 8, 2006 19:52:58 GMT -5
Come on people now Smile on your brother Everybody get together Try to love one another Right now /me holds up his mobile phone and sways
|
|
|
Post by DBBN on Feb 8, 2006 19:55:29 GMT -5
Which image is that supposed to be?
Anyway, I'm nearly universally adored. I need a punching bag whom alternately worships and envies me to feel human! I AM NOT A MACHINE!
|
|
|
Post by Brinyi on Feb 8, 2006 19:59:26 GMT -5
Which image is that supposed to be? Anyway, I'm nearly universally adored. I need a punching bag whom alternately worships and envies me to feel human! I AM NOT A MACHINE! I tried grouphug and that didn't work, then love and that didn't work, and I gave up. You freakin' morons aren't worth the trouble.
|
|
|
Post by DBBN on Feb 8, 2006 22:04:20 GMT -5
works! You don't care about us enough!
|
|
|
Post by Brinyi on Feb 8, 2006 22:09:39 GMT -5
works! You don't care about us enough!
|
|
|
Post by Grarliner on Feb 9, 2006 4:10:45 GMT -5
You and Chole were talking about the Justine/Kim comparison, which you have even admitted I had "nothing." So, since I never discussed it, I cannot take it seriously. You are wrong, you are an idiot. 1. I told you what I did take seriously. It's right there in the post you quoted. You are wrong, you are an idiot. 2. Man, it used to be hard to make you look stupid. Well...not hard. But less easy. That was a well-formatted post, oh brilliant one. How have you made me look stupid? Has it been by a. refuting my arguments? No, as you have admitted. Has it then been by b. railing on and on about how I'm "wrong" and "stupid"? Goebbels said if you repeat a lie long enough it becomes the truth, but you're not quite that good. You haven't even managed to c. have a fucking clue as to my point as you have now proven in this thread and in the Justine thread. Dismal job, Breakneck. Dismal job.
|
|
|
Post by Grarliner on Feb 9, 2006 4:12:23 GMT -5
Come on people now Smile on your brother Everybody get together Try to love one another Right now /me holds up his mobile phone and sways I had no idea you were such a Chris Gaines fan ...
|
|
|
Post by DBBN on Feb 9, 2006 11:02:42 GMT -5
You and Chole were talking about the Justine/Kim comparison, which you have even admitted I had "nothing." So, since I never discussed it, I cannot take it seriously. You are wrong, you are an idiot. 1. I told you what I did take seriously. It's right there in the post you quoted. You are wrong, you are an idiot. 2. Man, it used to be hard to make you look stupid. Well...not hard. But less easy. That was a well-formatted post, oh brilliant one. How have you made me look stupid? Has it been by a. refuting my arguments? No, as you have admitted. Has it then been by b. railing on and on about how I'm "wrong" and "stupid"? Goebbels said if you repeat a lie long enough it becomes the truth, but you're not quite that good. You haven't even managed to c. have a fucking clue as to my point as you have now proven in this thread and in the Justine thread. Dismal job, Breakneck. Dismal job. I did refute your arguments, retard. Try reading. And, again, I'll make you look the fool. I know your point. I'm not arguing it. I'm arguing something else, which is the argument that I have won easily.
|
|
|
Post by Grarliner on Feb 9, 2006 17:30:36 GMT -5
That was a well-formatted post, oh brilliant one. How have you made me look stupid? Has it been by a. refuting my arguments? No, as you have admitted. Has it then been by b. railing on and on about how I'm "wrong" and "stupid"? Goebbels said if you repeat a lie long enough it becomes the truth, but you're not quite that good. You haven't even managed to c. have a fucking clue as to my point as you have now proven in this thread and in the Justine thread. Dismal job, Breakneck. Dismal job. I did refute your arguments, retard. Try reading. And, again, I'll make you look the fool. I know your point. I'm not arguing it. I'm arguing something else, which is the argument that I have won easily. No, you didn't refute my arguments. You evaded them. If you know my point, you've yet to make that clear. What you are "arguing", you are wrong about because it makes no sense at all. You've misunderstood something along the way. I'd tell you, but why. Now as I've been saying, if you have nothing to say, and by all accounts (including your own), you do not, why don't you shut up? Although, this is fine too. The ridiculousness of you making a fool of yourself, unable to resist response, growing ever more hysterical, while you accuse me of "taking things too seriously" is something I've enjoyed. Look at what you're reduced to when you don't have me to leech your material off of!
|
|
|
Post by DBBN on Feb 9, 2006 22:14:33 GMT -5
I evaded the original argument, yes. I have admitted this now, what, twice? The very same point which you accused me of having "nothing." So...you've clearly not understood this, but whatever. As I've also said multiple times, I've proven you wrong about your other point, and I'm sorry you're too dense to grasp it. Said denseness is typified by the fact that you have attributed a quote many others have said about you to me when I haven't said anything of the sort, not even close. Because you are stupid and can't read.
|
|
|
Post by Pamela Shriver on Feb 9, 2006 22:42:20 GMT -5
I did refute your arguments, retard. Try reading. And, again, I'll make you look the fool. I know your point. I'm not arguing it. I'm arguing something else, which is the argument that I have won easily. No, you didn't refute my arguments. You evaded them. If you know my point, you've yet to make that clear. What you are "arguing", you are wrong about because it makes no sense at all. You've misunderstood something along the way. I'd tell you, but why. Now as I've been saying, if you have nothing to say, and by all accounts (including your own), you do not, why don't you shut up? Although, this is fine too. The ridiculousness of you making a fool of yourself, unable to resist response, growing ever more hysterical, while you accuse me of "taking things too seriously" is something I've enjoyed. Look at what you're reduced to when you don't have me to leech your material off of! What's ridiculous is having someone take this so seriously.
|
|
|
Post by The Chloe on Feb 9, 2006 23:06:48 GMT -5
Love is in the air.
|
|
|
Post by DBBN on Feb 9, 2006 23:34:07 GMT -5
The loooooooooooooove boat
|
|
|
Post by Wagasi on Feb 10, 2006 0:02:22 GMT -5
Love lift us up where we belooooong...
|
|
|
Post by Grarliner on Feb 10, 2006 4:47:31 GMT -5
I evaded the original argument, yes. I have admitted this now, what, twice? The very same point which you accused me of having "nothing." So...you've clearly not understood this, but whatever. As I've also said multiple times, I've proven you wrong about your other point, and I'm sorry you're too dense to grasp it. Said denseness is typified by the fact that you have attributed a quote many others have said about you to me when I haven't said anything of the sort, not even close. Because you are stupid and can't read. You like to get owned, don't you. This is you from the archived Tokyo main draw thread. "As it should be, idiot. I have other things to think about than everything everyone posts on this board. It's nice, you should try it." Now ... based upon those comments, one might think you were accusing me of taking this message board and therefore this discussion "too seriously". Idiot.
|
|
|
Post by Grarliner on Feb 10, 2006 4:50:13 GMT -5
I evaded the original argument, yes. I have admitted this now, what, twice? The very same point which you accused me of having "nothing." So...you've clearly not understood this, but whatever. As I've also said multiple times, I've proven you wrong about your other point, and I'm sorry you're too dense to grasp it. Said denseness is typified by the fact that you have attributed a quote many others have said about you to me when I haven't said anything of the sort, not even close. Because you are stupid and can't read. Now. Your evasion signifies that you have "nothing". Always did, still does. You contend otherwise, but you are full of shit. What you think my "other point" is and what you think you've "proven wrong" are both figments of your underactive imagination. But it is nice to see that something circulates in there. By the by, have you picked up your copy of the Emancipation of Mimi yet?
|
|
|
Post by Grarliner on Feb 10, 2006 4:52:16 GMT -5
No, you didn't refute my arguments. You evaded them. If you know my point, you've yet to make that clear. What you are "arguing", you are wrong about because it makes no sense at all. You've misunderstood something along the way. I'd tell you, but why. Now as I've been saying, if you have nothing to say, and by all accounts (including your own), you do not, why don't you shut up? Although, this is fine too. The ridiculousness of you making a fool of yourself, unable to resist response, growing ever more hysterical, while you accuse me of "taking things too seriously" is something I've enjoyed. Look at what you're reduced to when you don't have me to leech your material off of! What's ridiculous is having someone take this so seriously. I don't believe I am. Hurley occasionally likes to be a supercilious asshole, he just needs to be reminded sometimes who he can do it to and who he can't.
|
|
|
Post by DBBN on Feb 10, 2006 8:12:00 GMT -5
I evaded the original argument, yes. I have admitted this now, what, twice? The very same point which you accused me of having "nothing." So...you've clearly not understood this, but whatever. As I've also said multiple times, I've proven you wrong about your other point, and I'm sorry you're too dense to grasp it. Said denseness is typified by the fact that you have attributed a quote many others have said about you to me when I haven't said anything of the sort, not even close. Because you are stupid and can't read. You like to get owned, don't you. This is you from the archived Tokyo main draw thread. "As it should be, idiot. I have other things to think about than everything everyone posts on this board. It's nice, you should try it." Now ... based upon those comments, one might think you were accusing me of taking this message board and therefore this discussion "too seriously". Idiot. For the umpteenth time, you got angry about how people were accusing you of taking the Kim/Justine thing too seriously. That was in reference to a completely different idea which I am discussing -- clearly without you, since you have no bloody idea what I've been saying for days now -- where you decided I have "nothing" because I didn't respond. It actually means that you waiting for me to respond to every discussion on the board is futile because I just can't or don't want to. I've explained this to you a lot and I just don't think your life is firing.
|
|
|
Post by Pamela Shriver on Feb 10, 2006 12:20:52 GMT -5
She's in the Antwerp draw. Shocking.
|
|
|
Post by shenaynay on Feb 10, 2006 12:56:02 GMT -5
It's a miracle!
Maybe I should go to Belgium, touch Kim, and my sinus infection immediately disappears!
|
|
|
Post by R. Black on Feb 10, 2006 13:41:52 GMT -5
Kim just announced she'll give a kidney for each of her fans.
|
|
|
Post by shenaynay on Feb 10, 2006 14:14:58 GMT -5
What's ridiculous is having someone take this so seriously. I don't believe I am. Hurley occasionally likes to be a supercilious asshole, he just needs to be reminded sometimes who he can do it to and who he can't. Don't read too much into Andy's comments when he makes a new online friend!
|
|