Post by account_disabled on Dec 23, 2023 21:56:34 GMT -5
Arequired In today s opinions Advocate General Maciej Szpunar proposes that the Court of Justice should find that the EAW system should continue to apply as long as the UK is a member state It states that from the information provided by the High Court there does not appear to be any reason not to enforce the MEA in question The Advocate General reiterates first of all that the principle of mutual recognition based on mutual trust between Member States means that the execution of an MEA constitutes the rule and that a refusal to execute is an exception that must be strictly interpreted.
The Advocate General notes that none of the mandatory or optional Country Email List grounds for non execution of the European Arrest Warrant are present in the case at hand Specifically the Irish court concluded that apart from the consequences of Brexit there was no other objection such as potential inhuman or degrading treatment to RO s handover to the UK Next the Advocate General examines whether the UK s notification of its intention to leave the EU in any way affects the execution of the.
European Arrest Warrant He rejects the RO s argument that the UK s withdrawal notification constitutes an exceptional circumstance requiring the non execution of an MEA In his view as long as a state is still a member of the EU Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the duty to surrender the person concerned On the other hand according to the advocate general there are no concrete indications according to which the political circumstances that precede give rise to or succeed the withdrawal notification are likely to not respect the material content of the framework decision and the fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union European He makes the argument that the UK has decided to withdraw from
The Advocate General notes that none of the mandatory or optional Country Email List grounds for non execution of the European Arrest Warrant are present in the case at hand Specifically the Irish court concluded that apart from the consequences of Brexit there was no other objection such as potential inhuman or degrading treatment to RO s handover to the UK Next the Advocate General examines whether the UK s notification of its intention to leave the EU in any way affects the execution of the.
European Arrest Warrant He rejects the RO s argument that the UK s withdrawal notification constitutes an exceptional circumstance requiring the non execution of an MEA In his view as long as a state is still a member of the EU Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the duty to surrender the person concerned On the other hand according to the advocate general there are no concrete indications according to which the political circumstances that precede give rise to or succeed the withdrawal notification are likely to not respect the material content of the framework decision and the fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union European He makes the argument that the UK has decided to withdraw from